<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[CANNY logic forum — Faster CAN scan]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=74&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2023-09-11T18:05:35Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?id=74</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1038#p1038" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your following up! It&#039;s inspiring!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Konstantin, CANNY logic]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.cannylogic.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-09-11T18:05:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1038#p1038</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1037#p1037" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I want to follow up with this post. After I increase the scan time to advance setting(20ms) per Konstantin suggested, the &quot;scanning&quot; speed had been more responsive, I also added a Rising edge detector and the off button delay turning off to 150-180ms&nbsp; , so far the up shift and downshift button are very responsive and it catches every time I press the button, these devices are very capable and very potential for project like this.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[angellee200]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.cannylogic.com/profile.php?id=292</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-09-09T20:06:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1037#p1037</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1034#p1034" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome!<br />Of course, this is all part of the product knowledge base and is very valuable.<br />It will be livelier here, somewhen, I hope so.<br />Thanks for your intent to help!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Konstantin, CANNY logic]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.cannylogic.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-09-06T18:24:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1034#p1034</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1033#p1033" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Konstantin, you are the man , thank you very much.</p><p> I hope the next persons who is reading this found it useful, I will be on here more often as I want to be part of the community to help!</p><p>Thank you again!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[angellee200]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.cannylogic.com/profile.php?id=292</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-09-06T18:14:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1033#p1033</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1031#p1031" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m on my way!<br />First of all, &quot;Default positive input&quot; implies debouncing delays of 200 ms:&nbsp; <a href="https://cannylogic.com/docs/c7/io/#sec--c7-io-digital_input_mode" target="_blank">https://cannylogic.com/docs/c7/io/#sec- … input_mode</a><br />Just use advanced mode constants here.</p><p>Also, you can use shorter PWM generator #11 Period value</p><p>Please see attachment.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Konstantin, CANNY logic]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.cannylogic.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-09-06T15:13:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1031#p1031</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1030#p1030" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Anyone?&nbsp; The current behavior is that the delay whenever a button is pressed, let say a brake switch physically pressed, it is delayed for maybe 500ms-1000ms , I was hoping to have a faster response, should I use other method to transmit ON/OFF state onto the CAN network? shred some light please. thanx</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[angellee200]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.cannylogic.com/profile.php?id=292</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-09-05T09:30:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1030#p1030</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1029#p1029" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Canny Team,</p><p>&nbsp; I have been using the CAN scanning(switching) method converting all the digital signal(ON/OFF) onto CAN (Please see attached program), needing to get the shift pedal in more respond manner, so tried to increase the PWM to get the &quot;faster switching&quot; , I may not doing it right, can someone shred some light on scanning the input in faster rate , there are two input I need it in priorities, they are the shifter for the transmission ( CAN BUS) to receive. Thank you in advance.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[angellee200]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.cannylogic.com/profile.php?id=292</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-09-05T00:44:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1029#p1029</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
