<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[CANNY logic forum — Faster CAN scan]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?id=74</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.cannylogic.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=74&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Faster CAN scan.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:05:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1038#p1038</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your following up! It&#039;s inspiring!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Konstantin, CANNY logic)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1038#p1038</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1037#p1037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I want to follow up with this post. After I increase the scan time to advance setting(20ms) per Konstantin suggested, the &quot;scanning&quot; speed had been more responsive, I also added a Rising edge detector and the off button delay turning off to 150-180ms&nbsp; , so far the up shift and downshift button are very responsive and it catches every time I press the button, these devices are very capable and very potential for project like this.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (angellee200)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2023 20:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1037#p1037</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1034#p1034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome!<br />Of course, this is all part of the product knowledge base and is very valuable.<br />It will be livelier here, somewhen, I hope so.<br />Thanks for your intent to help!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Konstantin, CANNY logic)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1034#p1034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1033#p1033</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Konstantin, you are the man , thank you very much.</p><p> I hope the next persons who is reading this found it useful, I will be on here more often as I want to be part of the community to help!</p><p>Thank you again!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (angellee200)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1033#p1033</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1031#p1031</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m on my way!<br />First of all, &quot;Default positive input&quot; implies debouncing delays of 200 ms:&nbsp; <a href="https://cannylogic.com/docs/c7/io/#sec--c7-io-digital_input_mode" target="_blank">https://cannylogic.com/docs/c7/io/#sec- … input_mode</a><br />Just use advanced mode constants here.</p><p>Also, you can use shorter PWM generator #11 Period value</p><p>Please see attachment.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Konstantin, CANNY logic)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 15:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1031#p1031</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1030#p1030</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone?&nbsp; The current behavior is that the delay whenever a button is pressed, let say a brake switch physically pressed, it is delayed for maybe 500ms-1000ms , I was hoping to have a faster response, should I use other method to transmit ON/OFF state onto the CAN network? shred some light please. thanx</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (angellee200)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1030#p1030</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Faster CAN scan]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1029#p1029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Canny Team,</p><p>&nbsp; I have been using the CAN scanning(switching) method converting all the digital signal(ON/OFF) onto CAN (Please see attached program), needing to get the shift pedal in more respond manner, so tried to increase the PWM to get the &quot;faster switching&quot; , I may not doing it right, can someone shred some light on scanning the input in faster rate , there are two input I need it in priorities, they are the shifter for the transmission ( CAN BUS) to receive. Thank you in advance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (angellee200)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.cannylogic.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1029#p1029</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
